Is Scott McClellan's scathing ';tell all'; a fitting footnote to the Bush administrations lust for war ?

How many in the administration have come out to say what an idiot he is. at least 4 and the former head of the FBI.





scaryIs Scott McClellan's scathing ';tell all'; a fitting footnote to the Bush administrations lust for war ?
Not that I am a fan of the Bush Administration, but let me offer you a little ';buyer beware'; on this.





Scott McClellan's 15 minutes of fame are up. He will basically fade into the world of nobodys very soon. His chance to cash in on it is to take a 6 or 7 figure advancement on a book deal, in the hopes that Bush haters will lap it up as fact.





I'm not saying that McClellan will go as far as to out and out lie through the whole thing, but I think it's quite plausible that you may get a distortion of the truth in this instance. He has people basically saying, ';We'll give you a lot of money if you just give us some dirt on Bush.'; Well, if you give someone a lot of money, dirt is what you'll get, whether its 100% accurate or not.Is Scott McClellan's scathing ';tell all'; a fitting footnote to the Bush administrations lust for war ?
McClellan is a moron who (badly) lied at the podium REPEATEDLY while he was being a good soldier and lapdog for Bush, then when he gets a book deal decides that he can 'tell it as it is'...the fact that he sat idly by during scandal after scandal and towed the Bush line and spoke the same tired old talking points over and over and over and then speaks his mind MUCH LATER after the fact makes him as unAmerican as can be.





Just check out any of this dude's press briefings on youtube to see how moronic he is. He was horrible at that job, but then again so is Dana Perino, so was Ari Fleisher and Tony 'max headroom' Snow.





So McClellan tells all and exposes Bush as a fraud, a phony, close-minded and inept? That's news? Everyone on the face of the planet knows that stuff.
Footnote? No it is just one of the early tomes in what will likely be a piling on for years to come.


Public sentiment is against Bush. So Books that bash Bush will sell. Anyone who has some insight that is, well, 'bashing' will be publishing in the next few years to cash in.





Although I think current popular opinion is correct, and the brief excerpt of McClellan's book is compelling, we won't really have a the clearest picture of the true impact of the Bush White house until well after the 'bashing' period of the next few years.





But back when Scotty was press secretary and was tortuously defending the indefensible I just had to write a piece on it.


http://lolalesabre.blogspot.com/2006/02/鈥?/a>
If Bush has a ';lust for war'; then count me and hundreds of thousands of others in as being lusty. You can thank Bush that your head is still on top of your shoulders and neck.
It is more about getting reelected than a lust for war. A sure fire way to get elected again is to keep the simple minded scared. They succeeded and are still succeeding at that. Examples above.
I haven't read it, and I don't plan to.


Have you?